Does Access to Credit Improve Household Welfare in The Long-Run?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Household utility and its long-run impressionability from economic shocks
Due to the fact that in recent years, Iran has faced severe fluctuations and shocks from macroeconomic variables, the household utility has changed. Undoubtedly, without studying and researching the effects of these shocks on household utility, appropriate solutions cannot be provided to reduce its adverse consequences. Therefore, in the first stage, this study has extracted the household utili...
متن کاملHousehold Saving in LDCs : Credit Markets , Insurance and Welfare *
Some ways in which farmers in LDCs can protect their living standards against fluctuations in income are discussed. After considering the theory of consumption under uncertainty when there is no or limited borrowing, the case where some borrowing is allowed is also examined. Empirical evidence from some LDCs is used to look at (i) household borrowing and lending, their importance and timing, an...
متن کاملGovernment-run Credit Rating Agency and Social Welfare
This paper considers the social welfare implications of having a public rating agency in-stead of private sector credit rating agencies. The public rating agency is assumed to pay a fix compensation rather than a performance sensitive compensation and is assumed to dismiss its employee in case of "misconduct." The model predicts that the public rating agency may be socially beneficial if invest...
متن کاملSize does matter in the long run
Objective: To study the morphometric determinants of recall of verbal material for an extended period in an adult lifespan sample. Methods: Healthy adults of varying ages were studied using automated segmentation of MRI scans with volumes of hippocampus, cortex, and white matter, and verbal memory tests assessing recall after 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and a mean period of 11 weeks. Stepwise regres...
متن کاملDeregulation redux: does mandating access to bottleneck facilities necessarily improve welfare?
We demonstrate that deregulation in the form of vertical separation of network components into natural monopoly and potentially competitive markets does not truly represent a lessening of regulatory burdens. That is, vertical separation is not synonymous with deregulation; “more competitors” is not equivalent to “more competition”. We assume a public interest regulator that is constrained to se...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Developing Areas
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1548-2278
DOI: 10.1353/jda.2017.0007